Skip to main content
· 5/23/1994

United States v. Vance Jamal Valentine

Citations

  • 21 F.3d 395
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11867
  • 1994 WL 171600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If Valentine had been given notice that the district court was contemplating a departure based on these ‘facts,’ he would have had notice and opportunity to argue against the court’s mistaken factual conclusions; without such notice, this opportunity was lost.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Edmondson, Carnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.