United States Court of Military Appeals· 4/29/1993
United States v. Van Syoc
Citations
- 36 M.J. 461
- 1993 CMA LEXIS 59
- 1993 WL 132421
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he error was prejudicial because it deprived the defense of an instruction on their theory of the case.” Emphasis added.
- the defense of accident raised by the testimony of the accused’s wife and another who described the accused’s innocent explanation for the baby’s injuries
- duty to instruct arises when “some evidence” is presented raising the issue
- failure to instruct on defense theory of the case prejudicial error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cox, Crawford, Gierke, Sullivan, Wiss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.