Skip to main content

United States v. Van Syoc

Citations

  • 36 M.J. 461
  • 1993 CMA LEXIS 59
  • 1993 WL 132421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he error was prejudicial because it deprived the defense of an instruction on their theory of the case.” Emphasis added.
  • the defense of accident raised by the testimony of the accused’s wife and another who described the accused’s innocent explanation for the baby’s injuries
  • duty to instruct arises when “some evidence” is presented raising the issue
  • failure to instruct on defense theory of the case prejudicial error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Crawford, Gierke, Sullivan, Wiss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.