United States v. Upton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the United States is authorized to proceed with fraudulent conveyance claims under either state or federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• United States v. Snyder
  D. Connecticut· 2002-08-14· cited 6×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
• Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1980-01-08· cited 748×
• United States v. Randolph C. Fernon, Jr., Etc. And Susanna F. Fernon
  Fifth Circuit· 1981-03-23· cited 102×
• United States v. Joseph G. Lease
  Second Circuit· 1965-06-09· cited 94×
• John P. Pomeroy v. United States of America, John P. Pomeroy and Frances E. Pomeroy, Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee
  Fifth Circuit· 1989-02-08· cited 35×
• United States v. Red Stripe, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1992-03-20· cited 20×
• Charles Burke v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  Second Circuit· 1991-04-04· cited 14×
• United States v. Carney
  E.D. New York· 1992-05-19· cited 14×
• United States v. Bushlow
  E.D. New York· 1993-09-08· cited 8×