United States v. Universal Rehabilitation Services (PA), Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing that Indiana Code section 31-35-2-4(b)(2)(B) is written in the disjunctive, such that only one of the listed factors need be established
• discussing that because Indiana Code section 31-35-2-4(b)(2)(B) is written in the disjunctive, only one of the listed factors need be established
• explaining that “a child’s need for permanency is an important consideration in determining the best interests of a child”
• explaining that “a child’s need for permanency is an important consideration in determining the best interests of a child”
• holding there was sufficient evidence continuation of parent-child relationship posed a threat based on parent’s inability to remain drug free, manage mental illness, and maintain stable housing
• noting that section 4(b)(2)(B) is written in the disjunctive and that the trial court is required to find that only one prong of subsection (b)(2)(B) has been established

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).