Skip to main content
· 9/13/1999

Federal Case

Citations

  • 191 F.3d 750
  • 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 676
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 21935

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that where an argument was “never presented to the district court” it “cannot be considered by this court.”
  • noting the “general rule” that “[i]f an appellant . . . chooses to designate specific determinations in his notice of appeal-rather than simply appealing from the entire judgment-only the specified issues may be raised on appeal”
  • “Because the notice of appeal references only the district court’s summary judgment rulings, we do not have jurisdiction to consider issues raised in the Motion for Reconsideration.”
  • ‘We review an award of restitution for an abuse of discretion.”
  • “We review an award of restitution for an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.