· 6/15/1869
United States v. United States Exp. Co.
Citations
- 28 F. Cas. 352
- 5 Biss. 91
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding summary judgment for the employer was warranted because “the only evidence in support of [plaintiff's] claims was Solomon’s own testimony’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Drum, Drummond, Mond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.