Skip to main content
· 6/15/1869

United States v. United States Exp. Co.

Citations

  • 28 F. Cas. 352
  • 5 Biss. 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding summary judgment for the employer was warranted because “the only evidence in support of [plaintiff's] claims was Solomon’s own testimony’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Drum, Drummond, Mond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.