United States v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Marek qualified, although discrediting event study due to unreliable methodology
• noting 6 that the presence of the same common issues satisfied Rule 23(a)(2)
• “Plaintiffs made a prima facie showing that the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance applied because ... Juniper’s stock was actively traded on an efficient market — -the NASDAQ.”
• “Where thousands of identical complaints would 13 have to be filed, it is superior to concentrate claims through a class action in a single 14 forum.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).