Skip to main content
· 5/20/1994

United States v. Ung Kim, A/K/A Steve Kim

Citations

  • 23 F.3d 513
  • 306 U.S. App. D.C. 205
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11598
  • 1994 WL 194960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellate court should afford due deference to district court determination that defendant engaged in more than minimal planning
  • using due deference standard to review whether defendant’s actions constituted “more than minimal planning”
  • “Recognizing, then, that we must afford the district judge’s determination due deference, we turn to the question whether the crime can be thought to have involved more planning than is typical.”
  • “That check is in reference to a Disney excursion that left Washington taking some disabled folks.”
  • “That check is in reference to a Disney excursion that left Washington taking some disabled folks.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silberman, Williams, Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.