· 3/11/1992
United States v. Undetermined Quantities of Various Articles of Device Consisting in Whole or in Part of Proplast II or Proplast HA
Citations
- 800 F. Supp. 499
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14346
- 1992 WL 235387
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]hether a manufacturer is, in the Court’s estimation, in substantial compliance with [C]GMP regulations is immaterial if the FDA, in its discretion, determines that full compliance with the regulations is necessary.”
- “In order to prove a claim of adulteration of a device based upon noncompliance with [C]GMP regulations, the Government need not establish that the device is actually deficient as a result of the [C]GMP violation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hittner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.