United States v. Umana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant's identical argument because sections 3592(c) and 3593(d) authorize jury to consider non-statutory aggravating factors
• finding Confrontation Clause rights in first stage of federal capital sentencing but not the second stage
• “Absent guidance from the Supreme Court or the Fourth Circuit, the district courts are left to determine this issue.”
• \There is nothing per se unconstitutional about considering a defendant's lack of remorse as a characteristic that favors imposition of the death penalty.\ (citing Zant v. Stephens , 462 U.S. 862 , 885 n.22, 103 S.Ct. 2733 , 77 L.Ed.2d 235 (1983) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).