United States v. Ulysses Tines (94-5920), Glynn Bridgeforth (94-5923), and Belinda Marshall (94-5926)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the use of the pattern Allen Instructions, § 18.14 (3d ed. 1977
• approving the district court’s decision to issue a cautionary instruction “[tjwice before and once after the testimony was re-read”
• approving the district court’s decision to issue a cautionary instruction “[t]wice before and once after the testimony was re-read”
• applying the two concerns expressed in Padin to the district court’s decision to read back testimony
• Rule 606(b) barred consideration of juror affidavit outlining jury misconduct; effect of Allen charge upon jury did not constitute \outside influence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).