United States v. Ullman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that attorneys have been found adequate in other cases is persuasive evidence that they will be adequate again, absent persuasive evidence to the contrary.” (internal quotation marks omitted).
• “The fact that attorneys have been found adequate in other cases is persuasive evidence that they will be adequate again, absent persuasive evidence to the contrary.” (internal quotation marks omitted).

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).