United States v. Ulana Jaroszenko

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court thought that it lacked discretion to depart downward on account of defendant’s remorse, where court stated that defendant “deserves a downward departure on remorse” but then decided not to depart
• that government reminded district court of its discretion to depart “in general terms” did not automatically defeat appellate jurisdiction since reminders did not specifically relate to court’s discretion to depart based on particular ground asserted by defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).