United States v. Udechukwu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• it is improper for a prosecutor to question the existence of facts known by the prosecution to exist
• district court has discretion to dismiss in forma pauperis 12 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)
• new trial ordered where government failed to disclose exculpatory information and prosecutor deliberately and falsely argued that defendant’s story about the existence of a drug dealer had been fabricated, although the government knew the individual did, in fact, exist
• ‘‘[I]t is plainly improper for a prosecutor to imply reliance on knowledge or evidence not available to the jury. It is all the more improper to imply reliance on a fact that the prosecutor knows to be untrue . . . .’’ [Internal quotation marks omitted.]
• requiring reasonable suspicion for investigative traffic 12 stops

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).