· 10/11/1988
United States v. Tzavah Urban Renewal Corp.
Citations
- 696 F. Supp. 1013
- 19 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11349
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that defendants who were charged with hiring and firing contractors were \operators\ under the CAA
- finding that defendants who were charged with hiring and firing contractors were “operators” under the CAA
- strict-liability approach is consistent with both federal regulatory and criminal statutes designed to protect the public welfare, as well as well-accepted principles of tort law
- strietliability approach is consistent with both federal regulatory and criminal statutes designed to protect the public welfare, as well as well-accepted principles of tort law
- \The [National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants] regulations clearly bring the emission of asbestos within th[e] concept of 'ultrahazardous activity.' Asbestos is regarded as extremely dangerous to human health.\
- EPA obtained injunction to abate renovation of building containing asbestos against owners of building for Clean Air Act violations; imposing strict liability for NESHAP violations on owner is consistent with law involving ultrahazardous activity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lechner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.