Skip to main content
· 10/11/1988

United States v. Tzavah Urban Renewal Corp.

Citations

  • 696 F. Supp. 1013
  • 19 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that defendants who were charged with hiring and firing contractors were \operators\ under the CAA
  • finding that defendants who were charged with hiring and firing contractors were “operators” under the CAA
  • strict-liability approach is consistent with both federal regulatory and criminal statutes designed to protect the public welfare, as well as well-accepted principles of tort law
  • strietliability approach is consistent with both federal regulatory and criminal statutes designed to protect the public welfare, as well as well-accepted principles of tort law
  • \The [National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants] regulations clearly bring the emission of asbestos within th[e] concept of 'ultrahazardous activity.' Asbestos is regarded as extremely dangerous to human health.\
  • EPA obtained injunction to abate renovation of building containing asbestos against owners of building for Clean Air Act violations; imposing strict liability for NESHAP violations on owner is consistent with law involving ultrahazardous activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lechner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.