United States v. Tyrone Kirklin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a claim must be advanced, if it is to be preserved, even when all precedent is contrary” (quoting United States v. Messino, 382 F.3d 704, 715 (7th Cir. 2004) (Easterbrook, J., dissenting))
• holding for Alleyne v. United States
• \[C]ounsel's affirmative statement that he had no objection to the proposed jury instruction constitutes waiver of the ability to raise this claim on appeal.\
• failing to object to improper statutory minimum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).