United States v. Tyrese D. Hyles, Also Known as Little Ty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding under the Rule 901 standard, “the party ‘need only demonstrate a rational basis for its claim that the evidence is what the proponent asserts it to be’” (quoting United States v. Coohey, 11 F.3d 97, 99 (8th Cir. 1993))
• finding no prejudice because defendant did “not point to anything specific that would have been done if not for the late arrival of” certain evidence or “argue that, if the -2- continuance had been granted, the result of the trial would have been different”
• reviewing evidentiary rulings for “clear abuse of discretion” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).