Skip to main content
· 2/14/2014

United States v. Tyler Sanders

Citations

  • 743 F.3d 471
  • 2014 WL 572338
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 2835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has held that the exclusionary rule does not apply at criminal sentencing and that “[e]very other court of appeals has come to the same conclusion
  • noting that the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has held that the exclusionary rule does not apply at criminal sentencing and that “[e]very other court of appeals has come to the same conclusion”
  • Easterbrook, J., characterizing 18 U.S.C. § 3661 as a statute “which provides that all evidence is admissible at sentencing”; rejecting a proposed exception in that case for egregious violations of the Fourth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Easterbrook, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.