Skip to main content
· 11/15/1872

United States v. Two Trunks

Citations

  • 28 F. Cas. 320
  • 6 Ben. 218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “At the pleading stage[,] Genzyme is entitled to the benefit of a presumption of consumer deception because it has alleged the dissemination of literally false statements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatchford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.