· 6/7/1993
United States v. Two Tracts of Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances & Improvements Thereto, Located in Carteret County
Citations
- 998 F.2d 204
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13283
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- charge was a “fee,” not a “tax,” because it helped pay for costs of administrative agency’s regulatory activities
- NRC empowered under IOAA to charge for EIS because EIS is prerequisite for license and part of cost of providing special benefit to licensee
- “So long as the service provides a special benefit, above and beyond that which accrues to the public at large, to a readily-identifiable [ ] individual, the fee is permissible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ervin, Murnaghan, Restani, Trade
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.