United States v. Two Hundred Eighty Thousand Five Hundred & Five Dollars

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the claimant has the burden of establishing that he or she has a sufficient interest in the seized property
• claimant must establish standing before government has burden to prove connection exists between property forfeited and illegal drug activity
• claimant who possessed legal title lacked standing to contest forfeiture because she could not prove she could afford eight thousand ($8,000.00) dollar car payment and could not document where money to pay for car came from
• claimant who possessed legal title lacked standing to contest forfeiture because she could not prove she could afford eight thousand ($8,000.00) dollar car payment and could not document where money to pay for car came from
• listing factors to consider in establishing such consent
• marijuana residue consisting of seeds and stems

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).