Skip to main content
· 12/21/1955

United States v. Two Hollycrane Slot Machines

Citations

  • 136 F. Supp. 550
  • 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding “because the [Complaint] alleges misrepresentations or, at best, a combination of misrepresentation and omission, reliance cannot be presumed.”
  • “differences in damages among the potential class members do not generally defeat predominance if liability is common to the class”
  • “In a complex lawsuit . . . the representative need not have extensive knowledge of the facts of the case in order to be an adequate representative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.