United States v. Twitty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We have held . . . that [the presumption of vindictiveness] . . . does not apply . . . when the two proceedings are handled by different judges.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Rodriguez
  First Circuit· 1997-05-01· cited 45×
• In re: Jason Belice and Mishelle Belice
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-12-02
• United States v. Ramirez-Burgos
  First Circuit· 1997-05-21
• State of New Hampshire v. Ernesto Rivera
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2022-06-03

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• Wasman v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 595×
• United States v. Wilfredo Diaz-Villafane
  First Circuit· 1989-06-06· cited 426×
• United States v. Mirna Rivera, United States v. Robert Adamo
  First Circuit· 1993-06-04· cited 397×
• United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo Pupo
  First Circuit· 1989-04-28· cited 208×
• United States v. Jesus M. Quinones, A/K/A Jesus M. Quinones-Rodriguez
  First Circuit· 1994-06-08· cited 63×
• United States v. Rosales
  First Circuit· 1994-03-31· cited 62×
• United States v. Lombard, Jr.
  First Circuit· 1996-12-04· cited 45×
• United States v. Twitty
  First Circuit· 1995-12-28· cited 38×
• United States v. Rafael Jesus Dominguez, United States v. Daniel Joseph Maravilla
  First Circuit· 1991-11-19· cited 25×
• United States v. Clark
  First Circuit· 1996-05-30· cited 20×