United States v. Twaine Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reviewing court will assume that jury fol- lowed a Rule 404(b) limiting instruction
• noting that knowledge that substance is a narcotic is often proven through testimony about prior drug sales
• rejecting argument that relevant conduct must be proven to jury beyond a reasonable doubt
• when ascertaining base offense levels, a district court may determine drug quantities by a preponderance of the evidence
• “We assume that juries follow a court's instructions . . ..”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).