United States v. Tulu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that plea negotiations did not occur because defendant was not informed of the negotiations
• rejecting argument that plea negotiations did not occur because defendant was not informed of the negotiations
• “Nothing in the statute requires that the defendant consent to a continuance, Rather, a court can grant a continuance, over defendant’s objection, upon the Government’s motion, or on its own motion.”
• “Nothing in the statute requires that the defendant consent to a continuance. Rather, a court can grant a continuance, over defendant’s objection, upon the Government’s motion, or on its own motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).