Skip to main content
· 9/13/2002

United States v. Truong Quang Quach

Citations

  • 302 F.3d 1096
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 10609
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9442
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18760
  • 2002 WL 31040318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reassigning where the judge stated he would have denied a sentencing motion that was not brought initially, but could be filed on remand
  • reassigning where the judge stated he would have denied a sentencing motion that was not brought initially, but could be filed on remand
  • reassigning where the judge stated he would have denied a sentencing motion that was not brought initially, but could be filed on remand
  • remanding to a different district judge for resentencing to preserve the appearance of justice and clarifying that no criticism of the district judge was intended
  • “Although we generally remand for resentencing to the origi- nal district judge, we remand to a different judge if there are ‘unusual circumstances.’ ”
  • “The sentencing court, of course, still has discretion to reject the joint recommendation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Paez, Whelan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.