United States v. Trumblay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reconsideration was not warranted because a statute was enacted early enough to allow for a pre-judgment motion to amend the complaint and allege new violations
• “Rule 59(e) motions may not be used to relitigate old matters or to raise arguments ... that could have been raised prior to the entry of judgment.”
• “Rule 59(e) motions may not be used to relitigate old matters or to raise arguments . . . that could have been raised prior to the entry of judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).