United States v. Trelliny T. Turner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court’s acknowledgement that it has considered the Section 3553(a) factors is sufficient
• holding that an objection to the admission of Bruton material was not timely when an objection was not made during direct examination, but only the next day
• holding that the district court “need not state on the record that it has considered each of the § 3553(a) factors” and that an acknowledgment that it has considered the factors is sufficient
• explaining that when a defendant does not con- temporaneously object to an evidentiary ruling, we review for plain error
• affirming 240- month sentence when Guidelines range was 51–63 months
• affirming 240- month sentence when guidelines range was 51–63 months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).