Skip to main content
· 1/25/1989

United States v. Travles Russell Lane

Citations

  • 866 F.2d 103
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 618
  • 1989 WL 4243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \this does not mean that a prima facie case of discrimination arises every time a prosecutor strikes a black prospective juror\
  • “[T]his Court will not address the question of whether the defendant established a prima facie showing to satisfy Batson where the prosecutor articulated reasons for his strikes.”
  • “[T]his Court will not address the question of whether the defendant established a prima facie showing to satisfy Batson where the prosecutor articulated reasons for his strikes.”
  • “[T]his Court will not address the question of whether the defendant established a prima facie showing to satisfy Batson where the prosecutor articulated reasons for his strikes.”
  • “[T]his Court will not address the question of whether the defendant established a prima facie showing to satisfy Batson where the prosecutor articulated reasons for his strikes.”
  • \the fact that two black jurors were seated on Lane's jury and * * * prosecutor exercised only one of his three peremptory challenges tends to negate a motive to discriminate\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Widener, Ervin, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.