Skip to main content
· 1/5/2006

United States v. Travis Michael Cullen

Citations

  • 432 F.3d 903
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 130
  • 2006 WL 20549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s failure to object to the facts underlying a sentencing enhancement rendered those facts admitted, even though the defendant made an objection to the enhancement generally
  • error in imposing sentence under mandatory Guidelines not harmless where court sentenced defendant to bottom of Guidelines range

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bye, Beam, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.