United States v. Travis Lamont Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a drug conviction under Fla. Stat. § 893.13 (1) is a \serious drug offense\ under the ACCA
• holding that § 893.13(1) is a “controlled substance offense” even though it lacks an element of mens rea
• holding that Florida Statutes § 893.13(1) is a “serious drug offense” that qualifies as an ACCA predicate despite the absence of a mens rea requirement
• holding that convictions under Fla. Stat. § 893.13(1) qualify as “serious drug offense[s]” under § 924(e)(2)(A) of ACCA
• holding that a violation of Florida Statutes § 893.13(1)(a) after the mens rea requirement was eliminated is a “serious drug offense” under ACCA
• holding that a conviction under § 893.13(1) is a “serious drug offense” as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).