United States v. Travia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the defendant’s void for vagueness challenge to the FDCA and holding that “Congress has provided sufficient notice through these provisions; they are not so vague or standardless that the ordinary public is left uncertain as to what is prohibited”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).