United States v. Toyobo Co. Ltd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff alleged cause of action against non-submitter who induced submitters to continue manufacturing and selling to the government the non-submitter’s product
• denying claim under the False Claims Act because the government did not allege that \any of the relevant contracts contained express provisions requiring five-year warranties against defects\
• denying claim under the False Claims Act because the government did not allege that “any of the relevant contracts contained express provisions requiring five-year warranties against defects”
• denying motion to dismiss unjust enrichment claim against manufacturer of fibers for bulletproof vests, where government alleged that fiber manufacturer “indirectly” obtained benefit from government’s purchases of finished vests from vest manufacturers
• \A plaintiff in an [False Claims Act] action may plead-if not ultimately recover upon-alternative common law theories.\
• “The government’s complaint here alleges ... that Toyobo’s misrepresentations about Zylon’s accelerated deterioration induced the vest manufacturers to sell Zylon vests to the government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).