United States v. Totaro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although Rule 41(e) by its terms applies only to return of illegally seized evidence . . . courts have both the jurisdiction and the duty to order the return of seized evidence to its rightful owner . . . once the need for the evidence has terminated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).