United States v. Torres-Aquino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant was not entitled to a reduced sentence because the amendment on which he relied was not listed as a retroactive amendment in § 1B1.10
• explaining that a defendant is not entitled to a § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction based on an amendment not listed in § 1B1.10(d), and arguments about whether an amendment is clarifying (and therefore retroactive) or substantive (and therefore not retroactive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).