United States v. Torquato

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• delays of twenty to twenty-two months require dismissal where plaintiff has not shown sufficient excuse under a due diligence test
• “[t]he operative condition on a Rule 41(b) motion is lack of due diligence on the part of the plaintiff, ‘not a showing by defendant that it would be prejudiced’”
• “[t]he operative condition on a Rule 41(b) motion is lack of due diligence on the part of the plaintiff, ‘not a showing by defendant that it would be prejudiced’”
• “[t]he operative condition on a Rule 41(b) motion is lack of due diligence on the part of the plaintiff, not a showing by defendant that it would be prejudiced”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).