United States v. Tony William Wables

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the proper statutory classification of marijuana is an issue that is reserved to the judgment of Congress and to the discretion of the Attorney General”
• “this circuit has held that whether a document is a statement under the Jencks Act is a question for the trial court, not for the government”
• “[T]he government’s diligence in gathering and producing all pretrial statements within twenty-four hours” of discovering a Jencks Act issue signified good faith.
• a failure to produce Jencks material may be a harmless error \only when it is ’perfectly clear’ that the nondisclosure of Jencks Act statements did not prejudice the defendant\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).