Skip to main content
· 6/24/2003

United States v. Tony Si

Citations

  • 333 F.3d 1041
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 6919
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5485
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12735
  • 2003 WL 21453774

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The United States Supreme Court has not yet recognized a constitutional right to a court-appointed interpreter, but it has noted that the use of an interpreter is within the discretion of a trial court.”
  • direct appeal of federal criminal conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Beezer, Wardlaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.