Skip to main content
· 4/16/1985

United States v. Tony Darwin

Citations

  • 757 F.2d 1193
  • 18 Fed. R. Serv. 1215
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28916

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \the right to the presence of counsel simply does not extend to a situation in which the defendant is engaged in the commission of a separate offense\
  • “the right to the presence of counsel simply does not extend to a situation in which the defendant is engaged in the commission of a separate offense”
  • \[t]here was no abuse [of discretion] where questions relating to . . . income tax returns were curtailed because of their limited relevancy\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Godbold, Hill, Peck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.