United States v. Tony Alanis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a trial court 2580 UNITED STATES v. GUERRERO has reached step two of the Batson analysis, it must continue on to step three
• holding that the trial court “would have concluded that the prosecutor’s gender-neutral explanations were pretexts for purposeful discrimination” if it had “properly proceed[ed] to step three [of the Batson analysis]”
• emphasizing that the trial court has a “duty to proceed to step three”
• a court must “evaluate meaningfully the persuasiveness of the prosecutor’s” explanations
• trial court must “evaluate meaningfully the persuasiveness of” state’s explanation
• failing to conduct meaningful analysis at step three

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).