Skip to main content
· 7/29/2009

United States v. Tonks

Citations

  • 574 F.3d 628
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 16721
  • 2009 WL 2244599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the district court’s consecutive sentence because the district court discussed: (1) “the nature and circumstances of the offenses”; (2) “the kinds of sentences available”; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Smith, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.