United States v. Tommy Martin, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if a motion for reconsideration is brought before judgment or final, appealable order is entered, the time “limitation of Rule 59(e) does not apply”
• holding 13 that a district court’s judgment vacating a sentence does not become final and appealable until the defendant has been resentenced
• the deadline in Rule 59(e) to file a motion to alter or amend a judgment does not apply to interlocutory orders
• “Rule 60(b), like Rule 59(e), applies only to motions attacking final, appealable orders . . . .”
• a party who seeks reconsideration of an interlocutory bankruptcy order need not move for rehearing within ten days because the ten-day limitation of Rule 59(e) does not 3 Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 59(e
• discussing 23 the court’s inherent authority to reconsider non-final orders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).