United States v. Tom Guerrero, Also Known as Tom Pacheco, and Helen Guerrero, Also Known as Princey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we lack jurisdiction to review reasonable sentences imposed lawfully within the applicable guidelines’ range based solely on the argument that the sentence was too lenient or too draconian
• stating that there is nothing \in the legislative <br>history suggesting that the sentences within the Guidelines should <br>be reviewed because of a claim that a particular sentence is <br>draconian or too lenient\
• we affirm a sentence as long as it is not imposed in violation of law or based on an incorrect application of the guidelines
• similarly rejecting argument that trial judge had usurped the jury’s function by commenting on the admissibility of a co-conspirator’s out-of-court statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).