United States v. Todd Culbertson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defense counsel’s objection to the “ ‘substantive and procedural reasonableness of the sentence’ ” was insufficiently specific to preserve the Tapia error asserted on appeal
• reversible Tapia error where the district court repeatedly referred to the defendant’s rehabilitation needs in imposing a sentence three times the Guideline range
• five- to eleven-months Guidelines range; thirty-month sentence based in part on giving the defendant “a period of time where [he] can, once again, get clean and sober and stay clean and sober”
• analyzing Tapia claim under plain error
• analyzing Tapia claim under plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).