Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 5/29/2013

United States v. Tingey

Citations

  • 716 F.3d 1295
  • 2013 WL 2321656
  • 111 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2130
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10789

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that funds obtained from a loan, together with cash contributions, justified a resulting trust in favor of the borrower
  • noting that a transfer to the payor’s wife, child, or other natural object of bounty is an exception to the general presumption of a resulting trust

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Holloway, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.