United States v. Timothy Whiteagle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• find- ing that hiring individual who is “duplicat[ive]” can create in- ference that hiring was meant to “influence or reward” offi- cial
• “[S]ection No. 24-2495 15 666(a)(2) [] proscribes giving, offering, or agreeing to give a thing of value to someone with the corrupt intent to influence a transaction covered by the statute.”
• “Because it is phrased in the dis- junctive, section 666(a)(2) separately proscribes giving, offer- ing, or agreeing to give a thing of value to someone with the corrupt intent to influence a transaction covered by the stat- ute.”
• false statements to law enforcement can be probative of guilt
• false statements to law enforcement can be probative of guilt
• false statements to law enforcement can be probative of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).