Skip to main content
· 8/1/2006

United States v. Timothy W. Washington

Citations

  • 455 F.3d 824
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19346
  • 2006 WL 2129305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that where there is a basis in state law for an officer’s actions and some ambiguity exists that caused the officer to make the mistake, it may still be objectively reasonable
  • explaining prior judicial interpretations of a statute are “relevant to the objective reasonableness of the officer’s belief’
  • but finding that police officer’s mistaken belief that vision-obstruction statute applied to cracked windshields was not objectively reasonable
  • traffic stop is reasonable if it is supported by probable cause or articulable and reasonable suspicion that traffic violation has occurred
  • but finding that police officer's mistaken belief that vision-obstruction statute applied to cracked windshields was not objectively reasonable
  • instead looking at whether a mistake of law is “objectively reasonable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Gibson, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.