United States v. Timothy Stringer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant did not have standing to challenge the search of a passenger's cell phone because he had no reasonable expectation of privacy, as \[t]he Fourth amendment protects the people against unreasonable searches of 'their' effects\
• finding trooper’s observation of vehicle leaving a house known for drug transactions supported reasonable suspicion during traffic stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).