United States v. Timothy S. Curry, Samuel T. Harding, Don J. Leinenbach, Robert Holland and Roger S. Curry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the district court has the discretion to admit expert testimony on eyewitness identifications
• notice of the proposed proffer of expert testimony given four days before trial was prejudicial to the government and would have justified its exclusion
• parties may withdraw from a conspiracy at any time without affecting the fundamental nature of the conspiracy
• “However, ‘a district judge has broad discretion to exclude relevant evidence that is confusing or redundant’ under Federal Rule of Evidence 403.”
• upholding exclusion when 4 days notice given
• upholding exclusion when 4 days notice given

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).