United States v. Timothy N. Van Someren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a period between a superceding indictment and a re-arraignment was excludable from the seventy-day clock
• holding that a period between a superceding indictment and a rearraignment was excludable from the seventy-day clock
• holding that the period of time between a superseding indictment and arraignment on that indictment is excludable
• stating that \ends of justice\ exclusion and section 3161(h)(1) may in some cases permit continuation for plea negotiations
• “A number of circuits have determined that time expended on plea negotiations is excludable[.] ... For example, in United States v. Montoya, 827 F.2d 143 (7th Cir.1987

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).